精装
环境协定和税收理论
比较视角下的二氧化碳政策绩效
9781843768807 Edward Elgar Publishing
Although there is a huge demand for accurate analysis of environmental policy outcomes in both the academic and policy-making communities, there is currently very little theoretical research on this issue. This ambitious book redresses the balance by constructing a new theoretical framework at the crossroads between economics and political science to account for the effectiveness of environmental governance. Drawing on insights from new institutional economics, environmental economics, collective action theory and social capital theory, the author analyses how policy outcomes are influenced by institutional factors that constrain and empower the target groups of environmental regulation.
更多信息
Critical Acclaim
贡献者
内容
更多信息
Although there is a huge demand for accurate analysis of environmental policy outcomes in both the academic and policy-making communities, there is currently very little theoretical research on this issue. This ambitious book redresses the balance by constructing a new theoretical framework at the crossroads between economics and political science to account for the effectiveness of environmental governance. Drawing on insights from new institutional economics, environmental economics, collective action theory and social capital theory, the author analyses how policy outcomes are influenced by institutional factors that constrain and empower the target groups of environmental regulation.
This is the first attempt towards a general theoretical treatise of voluntary environmental agreements, based on a dual institutionalist approach that allows for comparisons between environmental taxes and agreements. The author systematically compares the performance of the radically different CO2 policy strategies of Austria, Denmark and the Netherlands – non-intervention, earmarked CO2 taxes and energy agreements. From this unique cross-national study, it is concluded that CO2 taxes are generally more effective than voluntary energy agreements which, if practised in specific institutional settings, will outperform laissez-faire policy alternatives.
本书将被要求阅读环境经济学家，政治科学家和气候变化研究人员。它还将为决策者提供有关如何设计自愿环境协定和绿色税来最大限度地设计环境效益的有用实证证据和建议。
This is the first attempt towards a general theoretical treatise of voluntary environmental agreements, based on a dual institutionalist approach that allows for comparisons between environmental taxes and agreements. The author systematically compares the performance of the radically different CO2 policy strategies of Austria, Denmark and the Netherlands – non-intervention, earmarked CO2 taxes and energy agreements. From this unique cross-national study, it is concluded that CO2 taxes are generally more effective than voluntary energy agreements which, if practised in specific institutional settings, will outperform laissez-faire policy alternatives.
本书将被要求阅读环境经济学家，政治科学家和气候变化研究人员。它还将为决策者提供有关如何设计自愿环境协定和绿色税来最大限度地设计环境效益的有用实证证据和建议。
Critical Acclaim
'Martin Enevoldsen为环境政策中最有争议的政策工具的理论属性提供了彻底和思考的探索。他对三个小型欧洲国家二氧化碳排放和政策的比较计量分析强调了环境视角的税收方针的优势。“
– Mikael Skou Andersen, Professor, National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark
“马丁Enevoldsen tha的书是一项开创性的工作t compares the impacts of various non-regulatory environmental strategies in achieving measurable pollution reductions. Much has been written on the theoretical virtues and drawbacks of green taxation versus the adoption of voluntary agreements when it comes to effective implementation of environmental goals. In convincing detail, this book makes the case for the effectiveness of environmental taxation, its barriers being primarily political in nature rather than economic. Green taxes are highly controversial even in the most environmentally conscious nations, particularly when they are regarded as a purely fiscal instrument. The successful Danish CO2 taxation on industry, which this study proves to be much more effective than the Dutch system of voluntary agreements or the Austrian laissez-faire policies, relied not only on the inducement of the CO2 tax itself; all of the tax revenue was ploughed back into industry as subsidies for investments in advanced energy saving technologies. Martin Enevoldsen’s book is simply a “must” for political scientists, environmental economists and environment policymakers.’
- Svend Auken，M.P.和前丹麦人部长为环境和能源
– Mikael Skou Andersen, Professor, National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark
“马丁Enevoldsen tha的书是一项开创性的工作t compares the impacts of various non-regulatory environmental strategies in achieving measurable pollution reductions. Much has been written on the theoretical virtues and drawbacks of green taxation versus the adoption of voluntary agreements when it comes to effective implementation of environmental goals. In convincing detail, this book makes the case for the effectiveness of environmental taxation, its barriers being primarily political in nature rather than economic. Green taxes are highly controversial even in the most environmentally conscious nations, particularly when they are regarded as a purely fiscal instrument. The successful Danish CO2 taxation on industry, which this study proves to be much more effective than the Dutch system of voluntary agreements or the Austrian laissez-faire policies, relied not only on the inducement of the CO2 tax itself; all of the tax revenue was ploughed back into industry as subsidies for investments in advanced energy saving technologies. Martin Enevoldsen’s book is simply a “must” for political scientists, environmental economists and environment policymakers.’
- Svend Auken，M.P.和前丹麦人部长为环境和能源
贡献者
内容
内容：前言1.介绍2.经济学和政治学中的环境治理方法3.一个双重制度主义方法4.自愿协议和自由骑手问题5.机构，社会资本和自愿环境协定6.在机构设计中绿色税的有效性7.对工业部门的二氧化碳政策的比较分析8.奥地利，丹麦和荷兰工业二氧化碳污染的间接监管。国家一级二氧化碳政策绩效的比较分析10.工业的计量计量分析1958 - 2000年期间的二氧化碳排放量11.微级：对清洁能源技术的政策刺激12.关于理论和政策的思考附录1：统计数据来源附录2：采访组织列表参考指数
