精装
The Legislative Choice Between Delegated and Implementing Acts in EU Law
走迷宫
9781788115223 爱德华伊利加出版社
In the face of the current confusion about the use of arts 290 and 291 TFEU, there is need of further development of the theory of legislative delegation to the EU Commission. This timely book approaches this question from a practical perspective with a detailed examination of how the legislator uses delegated and implementing mandates in different fields of EU law. Offering an analysis of legislative practice and providing concrete evidence of how articles 290 and 291 TFEU are actually handled, it offers new insight into potential developments in EU administrative law.
More Information
备受好评
贡献者
内容
More Information
In the face of current confusion regarding the use of articles 290 and 291 TFEU, there is a need to further develop the theory of legislative delegation in the EU Commission. This timely book approaches this question from a practical perspective with a detailed examination of how the legislator uses delegated and implementing mandates in different fields of EU law.
Offering an analysis of legislative practice and providing concrete evidence of how articles 290 and 291 TFEU are actually handled, the expert contributors offer new insights into potential developments in EU administrative law. From this emerges a tentative categorisation that separates delegated rule-making from implementing rule-making according to the differentiation of substantive and procedural matters. However, as difficulties in the categorisation continue to remain, the book explores their systemic reasons, deeply rooted in the unclear constitutional shape of the EU.
欧盟法律委托和实施行为之间的立法权将是法律学者和课程领导人的重要阅读，以及在国家和欧盟管理局对欧盟行政法的辩论核心遗嘱感兴趣的从业人员。
Offering an analysis of legislative practice and providing concrete evidence of how articles 290 and 291 TFEU are actually handled, the expert contributors offer new insights into potential developments in EU administrative law. From this emerges a tentative categorisation that separates delegated rule-making from implementing rule-making according to the differentiation of substantive and procedural matters. However, as difficulties in the categorisation continue to remain, the book explores their systemic reasons, deeply rooted in the unclear constitutional shape of the EU.
欧盟法律委托和实施行为之间的立法权将是法律学者和课程领导人的重要阅读，以及在国家和欧盟管理局对欧盟行政法的辩论核心遗嘱感兴趣的从业人员。
备受好评
“该卷”提供了第三级法律来源的主要问题准确概述，这使得研究人员，从业者和政策制定者对委员会解释执行统治的复杂性的研究人员，从业者和政策制定者的推荐阅读。该卷也达到了促进欧盟高管统治权的更广泛理解和表征的额外目标。因此，它有价值丰富并支持该领域欧盟行政法奖学金的发展。
- Marta Simoncini，欧洲行政法审查
‘The book is impressive due to the broad range of perspectives brought to bear on the topic. The reader will find doctrinal analyses of the topic as well as a more pragmatic, empirical examination of the legislative behaviour of Union institutions.’
– Pieter-Augustijn Van Malleghem, Common Market Law Review
‘Ever since the Lisbon Treaty introduced both delegated and implementing acts into the EU’s legal system, observers and practitioners alike have debated the nature and the implications of the choice between these different instruments. This authoritative book sheds light on the many intricacies of this “labyrinth”, making it a compelling read for anyone seeking a better understanding of delegated rule-making in the European Union.’
– Thomas Christiansen, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
‘The choice between delegated and implementing acts is one of the most important innovations brought by the Lisbon Treaty and still poses many complex constitutional questions. This book offers an insightful and provocative re-evaluation of these questions in their theoretical, jurisprudential and practical contexts; and it will, as such, be of great interest to all students of the Union’s executive law-making powers.’
- RobertSchütze，达勒姆大学，英国和欧洲学院，Bluges
“第290条”和“291篇TFEU”旨在为欧盟的下属立法提供明确的框架。然而，清晰度在欧洲和里斯本条约之间丧失。Tauschinsky和Weiß收集了非常彻底的分析，以回答委派和实施立法之间的差异化的多元化问题。
- Matthias Ruffert，Humboldt-UniversitätZu Berlin，德国
- Marta Simoncini，欧洲行政法审查
‘The book is impressive due to the broad range of perspectives brought to bear on the topic. The reader will find doctrinal analyses of the topic as well as a more pragmatic, empirical examination of the legislative behaviour of Union institutions.’
– Pieter-Augustijn Van Malleghem, Common Market Law Review
‘Ever since the Lisbon Treaty introduced both delegated and implementing acts into the EU’s legal system, observers and practitioners alike have debated the nature and the implications of the choice between these different instruments. This authoritative book sheds light on the many intricacies of this “labyrinth”, making it a compelling read for anyone seeking a better understanding of delegated rule-making in the European Union.’
– Thomas Christiansen, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
‘The choice between delegated and implementing acts is one of the most important innovations brought by the Lisbon Treaty and still poses many complex constitutional questions. This book offers an insightful and provocative re-evaluation of these questions in their theoretical, jurisprudential and practical contexts; and it will, as such, be of great interest to all students of the Union’s executive law-making powers.’
- RobertSchütze，达勒姆大学，英国和欧洲学院，Bluges
“第290条”和“291篇TFEU”旨在为欧盟的下属立法提供明确的框架。然而，清晰度在欧洲和里斯本条约之间丧失。Tauschinsky和Weiß收集了非常彻底的分析，以回答委派和实施立法之间的差异化的多元化问题。
- Matthias Ruffert，Humboldt-UniversitätZu Berlin，德国
贡献者
贡献者：M. Chamon，J.Karsten，F. Lafarge，M. Ortino，A. Ott，S.Röttger-Wirtz，E. Tauschinsky，A. Vincze，W.Weiß，D.Zdobnõh
内容
内容：
介绍
Eljalill Tauschinsky和沃尔夫冈魏ß
1. Delegation versus Implementation: A deconstruction of the promise of the Lisbon Treaty
Attila Vincze.
2.第290和291篇TFEU之间的竞争：这两个文章是什么？
dmitrijzdobnõh.
3.更好的监管政策对欧盟委派和实施法则制定的影响
Françoislafarge.
4.里斯本协商学和第三律法 - 食品和农业法典的例子
Jens Karsten.
5.委派和实施制药法规的行为 - 通过子公司镜头分析
Sabrina Röttger-Wirtz
6.欧盟金融市场领域的权力代表团法规
Matteo Ortino
7. Beyond Delegated and Implementing Acts: Where do EU Agencies Fit in the Article 290 and 291 Scheme?
Merijn Chamon.
8.欧盟委员会的行政协议：委派和实施规则制定之间的“授权条约”
Andrea Ott
而不是结论 - 更多问题
Eljalill Tauschinsky和沃尔夫冈魏ß
Index
介绍
Eljalill Tauschinsky和沃尔夫冈魏ß
1. Delegation versus Implementation: A deconstruction of the promise of the Lisbon Treaty
Attila Vincze.
2.第290和291篇TFEU之间的竞争：这两个文章是什么？
dmitrijzdobnõh.
3.更好的监管政策对欧盟委派和实施法则制定的影响
Françoislafarge.
4.里斯本协商学和第三律法 - 食品和农业法典的例子
Jens Karsten.
5.委派和实施制药法规的行为 - 通过子公司镜头分析
Sabrina Röttger-Wirtz
6.欧盟金融市场领域的权力代表团法规
Matteo Ortino
7. Beyond Delegated and Implementing Acts: Where do EU Agencies Fit in the Article 290 and 291 Scheme?
Merijn Chamon.
8.欧盟委员会的行政协议：委派和实施规则制定之间的“授权条约”
Andrea Ott
而不是结论 - 更多问题
Eljalill Tauschinsky和沃尔夫冈魏ß
Index
